Skip to content
FilterScored

Culligan US-EZ-4 vs Aquasana AQ-5200

Bottom line

Both are excellent, genuinely certified picks - you are not making a mistake either way. The Culligan's NSF/ANSI 401 and PFAS certification gives it a slightly wider net, so it edges ahead on breadth. Compare cost per gallon against how much water you actually filter before you decide.

This is a happy problem: both are among the best-certified under-sink filters we score, so you are choosing between two good options, not avoiding a bad one. The Culligan is IAPMO-certified to NSF/ANSI 42, 53, and 401 - the last of which covers harder-to-catch contaminants like pharmaceuticals - including PFOA/PFOS. The Aquasana is certified for lead, PFAS, and chlorine. It comes down to how wide a certified net you want and what each costs to run.

10 certified / 11 marketedCertified vs marketed contaminants12 certified / 12 marketed
9.0Verified Contaminant Reduction35%9.0
5.0Total Cost of Ownership25%2.5
8.0Certification Independence15%10.0
8.0Capacity & Flow Fit15%8.0
7.0Practical Fit10%7.0

FAQ

Is the Culligan US-EZ-4 Under-Sink better than the Aquasana AQ-5200 Under-Sink?
In our scoring the Culligan US-EZ-4 Under-Sink rates 7.5/10 and the Aquasana AQ-5200 Under-Sink 7.2/10. Both are excellent, genuinely certified picks - you are not making a mistake either way. The Culligan's NSF/ANSI 401 and PFAS certification gives it a slightly wider net, so it edges ahead on breadth. Compare cost per gallon against how much water you actually filter before you decide.
Are both certified for PFAS?
Yes - and that puts them ahead of most of the field. The Culligan is certified for PFOA/PFOS under NSF/ANSI 401, and the Aquasana is certified for PFOA/PFOS as well. Both certifications you can look up, unlike the many 'tested to' competitors whose claims we cannot verify.

Stay in the loop

From FilterScored

Updates from FilterScored, when there is something worth sharing.