Skip to content
FilterScored

Levoit Core 300S vs Levoit Core 400S

Bottom line

This one is a tie in our scoring at 7.1/10 each, so we split the recommendation by room. We score the Core 300S the better pick for a bedroom or small-to-medium room: its verified 175 cfm CADR is enough for its 219 sq ft rating, and at $375 over five years it is the cheaper unit to own. We score the Core 400S the better pick for a large living room, where its AHAM-verified 259 cfm CADR honestly backs the 358 sq ft rating that the 300S cannot reach. Buying the pricier 400S for a small room is, in our view, paying $190 over five years in filters for output you will not use. Both share the same weak spot in our scoring, certification at 5.0/10, since neither carries certification beyond AHAM CADR and Energy Star.

These two Levoit smart HEPA purifiers tie at 7.1/10 in our scoring, so the choice comes down to room size and running cost, not quality. The Core 400S verifies a higher 259 cfm pollen CADR through AHAM and covers a rated 358 sq ft, versus the Core 300S at 175 cfm and a rated 219 sq ft. That extra output costs more to feed: the 400S runs about $75 a year in filters ($565 over five years with the device), while the 300S runs about $45 a year ($375 over five years). Both use an H13 HEPA filter, both verify their CADR through AHAM, and neither uses any ozone-producing technology.

175 cfm (AHAM-verified)CADR (independently verified?)259 cfm (AHAM-verified)
7.0Verified Performance30%7.0
6.0Total Cost of Ownership25%6.0
5.0Certification15%5.0
8.0Safety15%8.0
10.0Practical Fit15%10.0

FAQ

Is the Levoit Core 300S better than the Levoit Core 400S?
In our scoring the Levoit Core 300S rates 7.1/10 and the Levoit Core 400S 7.1/10. This one is a tie in our scoring at 7.1/10 each, so we split the recommendation by room. We score the Core 300S the better pick for a bedroom or small-to-medium room: its verified 175 cfm CADR is enough for its 219 sq ft rating, and at $375 over five years it is the cheaper unit to own. We score the Core 400S the better pick for a large living room, where its AHAM-verified 259 cfm CADR honestly backs the 358 sq ft rating that the 300S cannot reach. Buying the pricier 400S for a small room is, in our view, paying $190 over five years in filters for output you will not use. Both share the same weak spot in our scoring, certification at 5.0/10, since neither carries certification beyond AHAM CADR and Energy Star.
Which is better for a bedroom?
In our scoring, the Core 300S. Its 175 cfm CADR is AHAM-verified and matches its 219 sq ft rating, which covers most bedrooms, and it runs quieter on cost at about $45 a year in filters versus $75 for the 400S. Both drop to a 24 dBA sleep level, so noise is not the deciding factor.
Is the Core 400S worth the extra money?
Only if your room is large. The 400S verifies a 259 cfm CADR through AHAM and honestly covers a rated 358 sq ft, which the 300S cannot reach. For a room of 219 sq ft or less, we see no scoring benefit to paying the higher up-front price and $565 five-year cost when the 300S delivers enough verified output for $375.
Does the Core 400S really cover 358 sq ft?
In our view its 358 sq ft rating is honest, because it is backed by the unit's own AHAM-verified CADR rather than a marketing claim. At that size it still delivers 4.8 air changes per hour in our calculation, the same rate the 300S hits in its smaller 219 sq ft rated room.

Stay in the loop

From FilterScored

Updates from FilterScored, when there is something worth sharing.